Buy used:
$5.20
FREE delivery May 20 - 29. Details
Or fastest delivery May 14 - 17. Details
Used: Good | Details
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: This item shows signs of wear from consistent use, but it remains in good condition and works perfectly. All pages and cover are intact , but may have aesthetic issues such as small tears, bends, scratches, and scuffs. Spine may also show signs of wear. Pages may include some notes and highlighting. May include "From the library of" labels. Satisfaction Guaranteed.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

The Climb: Tragic Ambitions on Everest Mass Market Paperback – July 15, 1998

4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 1,934 ratings

There is a newer edition of this item:

As the climbers of the 1996 Mt. Everest disaster vanished into thin air, one man had the courage to bring them down alive...

On May 10, 1996, two commercial expeditions headed by expert leaders attempted to scale the world's largest peak. But things went terribly wrong. Crowded conditions, bad judgement, and a bitter storm stopped many climbers in their tracks. Others were left for dead, or stranded on the frigid mountain. Anatoli Boukreev, head climbing guide for the Mountain Madness expedition, stepped into the heart of the storm and brought three of his clients down alive. Here is his amazing story-of an expedition fated for disaster, of the blind ambition that drives people to attempt such dangerous ventures, and of a modern-day hero, who risked his own life to save others..
Read more Read less

Amazon First Reads | Editors' picks at exclusive prices

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Raw but powerful...[Boukreev] took action. He chose danger, and he saved lives." --The New York Times Book Review

"One of the most amazing rescues in mountaineering history, performed single-handedly a few hours after climbing Everest without oxygen by a man some describe as the Tiger Woods of Himalayan climbing." --
Wall Street Journal

"[
The Climb] has a ring of authenticity that challenges the slickly written Into Thin Air...Compelling" --Minneapolis Star Tribune

About the Author

Anatoli Boukreev was one of the world's foremost high-altitude mountaineers, arguably the finest of his generation. He had summited eleven of the world's 8,000 meter peaks without the use of supplementary oxygen, some of them, including Mount Everest, multiple times. In all, he attempted twenty-one times he was successful. Born in Russia where he received the Master of Sports with Honors, Boukreev had made his home in Kazakhstan where in 1998 the President of that Republic awarded him posthumously the "Erligi Ushin" Medal for his contributions to high-altitude mountaineering and for his personal courage.

G. Weston Dewalt is a writer and investigative filmmaker who specializes in human rights issues, the confluence of humankind and the environment, and biography. His film Genbaku shi: Killed by the Atomic Bomb compelled the U.S. Department of Defense to acknowledge that American POWs had been killed during the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. He divides his time between Santa Fe, New Mexico, and London.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ St. Martin's Paperbacks (July 15, 1998)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Mass Market Paperback ‏ : ‎ 297 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0312965338
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0312965334
  • Lexile measure ‏ : ‎ 1270L
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 6.2 ounces
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 4.24 x 0.87 x 6.8 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 1,934 ratings

About the authors

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Customer reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
4.4 out of 5
1,934 global ratings
Bunch of bland repetitive finger pointing
1 Star
Bunch of bland repetitive finger pointing
The book was bland with repetitive details. Bunch of excuses. I think I would rather be on jury duty than read this book. I found it was putting me asleep and couldn’t finish it.
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on February 2, 2024
Although not quite as sensational as into thin air, it does provide a great rebuttal to the sometimes harshness of the other book. In the first portion, Toli does get a bit too negative about the situation, and it seems like he quite seems to think he's the percect mountaineer, if a bit rough around the edges. How severe and how much of that is his personality, and how much of it from into thin air is due to language and cultural differences and barriers, I'm not sure. Of course, given who he is and what he accomplished, he may have been one of the best mountaineers, he was definitely one of the bravest.

Overall, I'm glad I read this book and feel as though I have a better understanding of both sides of the story and controversy.
2 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on April 15, 2005
I have read almost all of the published accounts of this tragic season and found Boukreev's to be the most detailed and honest of the bunch. Like most of us, I first read Krakauer's "Into Thin Air" and was appalled at Anatoli's behavior as described by the author. I still agree with Krakauer that Boukreev should not have attacked the mountain in the manner in which he did (ahead of all the clients) but it's VERY evident from reading other accounts about this disaster that Anatoli was doing what he believed he should be doing.

When I first began reading "The Climb", it felt like somewhat of a rebuttal to "Into Thin Air" and it's evident that there are passages throughout the book that are meant to defend against statements made in Krakauer's account. In fact, I firmly believed I would not like the book because of Krakauer's interpretation of Boukreev's behavior on the mountain.

After completing this book, I re-read Krakauer's book and felt that his criticisms of Boukreev were a bit harsh, particularly harping on Anatoli's choice to not use oxygen. Most formidable high-altitude mountain guides DO use oxygen when guiding even if they choose not to use when they are climbing for their own pleasure and doctors will tell you that it's ludicrous to believe that one would be better off or even as well off without supplemental oxygen as they would with it; however, most experienced high-altitude mountaineers will also tell you that being on oxygen and running out is WORSE than never having used oxygen at all. Eric Simonson has said that running out of oxygen at high altitude is equivalent to putting your head inside a plastic bag and duct-taping it around your neck. Anatoli always stated that, as a guide using oxygen, he might need to give it up his oxygen (which he did carry) to a needy client which would greatly hinder his ability to guide. Boukreev was one of those rare humans who are physiologically suited for high altitude and besides, at no time did Anatoli's lack of oxygen have any bearing on the way he guided that day.

It's evident from reading his book that Boukreev firmly believed if you were on Mt. Everest then you should be capable of climbing it. He was very much against the idea of "babysitting" clients with questionable mountaineering skills up a mountain that they had no business being on. One odd thing about Boukreev is that he was almost like half-Sherpa and half-guide. He assisted with hauling gear to the higher camps and fixed rope in several difficult areas along the route. Krakauer seemed to exaggerate the altercations that Anatoli had with Scott Fischer, however, Krakauer was able to see that Fischer was being affected by the altitude where Boukreev recognizes that Fischer is tired, but still trusts Fischer to make crucial decisions on summit day, the biggest of which was allowing Boukreev to descend ahead of the clients to prepare provisions for the climbers in the event that he needed to head back up the mountain in a rescue effort. Of course, one detail that Krakauer left out or wasn't aware of was that Boukreev believed that the team had NO sherpas left at Camp IV and that someone would need to prepare tea for the exhausted incoming climbers and insure that they got oxygen, hydration, etc. Also, if a rescue from Camp IV were necessary, he needed to rehydrate and rest himself in order to go back up the mountain. As we all know, this is exactly what occurred. So, it may have been flawed thinking, but he BELIEVED that he was doing the right thing and it was agreed upon between he and Fischer that this would be the plan. If he can be faulted at all, it might be for not recognizing that Scott Fischer was probably incapable of making a clear decision in his altitude-affected state. That being said, Scott Fischer was not one to let on that he was hurting and he was Boukreev's boss. Many of us don't question our bosses when we believe they may be making a bad decision.

After re-reading "Into Thin Air", I realized that there were big gaps in Krakauer's account, not the least of which is his trek from the top of the Hillary Step to the South Summit without oxygen. In Krakauer's book, he mentions how Andy Harris has turned his oxygen up instead of down like he asked him to do and then he ran out of oxygen. Then he says that the "Step" cleared, he went down and then he goes into his encounter with Andy Harris at the South Summit oxygen cache. In "The Climb", Boukreev tells of how Krakauer nearly fell to his death stumbling across the unroped area along the South ridge in his oxygen-deprived state. Krakauer never makes mention of this and probably because he doesn't remember it. Let's not forget that Krakauer thought Martin Adams was Andy Harris and actually communicated to Base Camp that Harris had safely returned to Camp IV when, in fact, Harris was somewhere around the South Summit.

It is my opinion that Krakauer was much more severely affected by the high altitude on that day than Boukreev was and, as a result, I trust Anatoli's memory of the events more than I do that of Krakauer even if "The Climb" was written in rebuttal to "Into Thin Air". It goes without saying that had Anatoli not guided the mountain in the manner which he did, that more people would have died in those days and the altitude-affected recollection of John Krakauer isn't enough to convince me that the opposite is true. One thing that all climbers on that mountain will agree on is that if there is a villain in this tragic story, it was Ian Woodall, leader of the South African expedition.
52 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on April 11, 2016
I am currently very interested in the Everest tragedy and as part of that, I am reading as many memoirs of the event as possible. I already knew about the existing conflict between Krakauer’s (Into Thin Air) and Anatoli’s memoir but I wanted to give them both a chance to voice their opinions.

I truly loved reading Boukreev’s memoir. He provided an inside look at mountain climbing that I had not been aware of before. The main portion of the book is simply describing events as he remembers them. He doesn’t place blame on anybody for what occurred that day and he doesn’t question that actions of others (like a certain Jerkauer does in his book). It appears that he just wants to have his voice heard and to share his story about what happened. He also wanted to pay tribute to those who lost their lives that day. Scott Fischer and Rob Hall were very important people in the commercialization of mountain climbing and this tragedy affected Boukreev deeply, as well asthe loss of Namba, who Boukreev felt deep personal guilt over.

In this version of the book, there are several documents after the book actually ends which are interesting to read. An In Memoriam for Boukreev who passed away in 1997 and a few responses to Krakauer’s book. Krakauer does not come off well in this part. It’s very respectfully done, but to me, Krakauer comes off as kind of like an arrogant baby. What we have to remember with these memoirs, is that it is all memories. At that altitude and given the events of the day, memories can become eschewed. It’s very likely that these men remembered the story differently, but to them, it was the truth.

Overall, this was a very interesting read. I loved hearing Boukreev’s perspective on the events and about his experiences both that day and otherwise. He’s not the bad guy, and he felt he was represented in that way and this gave him an opportunity to show that he’s not. He’s responsible for having saved at least 3 people that day. That doesn’t sound like a bad guy to me. If you’re interested in the Everest disaster, this should definitely be one of the memoirs that you check out!
20 people found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
Mark
5.0 out of 5 stars Great book
Reviewed in Canada on August 5, 2021
Bought this for the wife and she couldn’t put it down, great book for those Everest fans
One person found this helpful
Report
natalia
5.0 out of 5 stars Captivador
Reviewed in Spain on June 26, 2021
Super interesante y buena contraparte de krakauer...
otakte
5.0 out of 5 stars La découverte d'un grand monsieur
Reviewed in France on March 30, 2017
Hélas disparu trop tôt, Boukreev apparaît dans ce livre complètement différent que l'image qu'en veut donner Krakauer....Sa philosophie, sa vision de son sport, son souci de la sécurité, son dévouement envers les autres en fait quelqu'un d'attachant...et de respectable...C'est un héros reconnu puisqu'il a reçu une récompense du Clup Alpin aux USA pour avoir sauvé des vies au péril de la sienne....Son attitude de respect, de regret vis à vis de Scott Ficher ou de Yosuko Namba montre à l'évidence qu'on est loin du personnage dessiné par Krakauer.....Merci à Weston Dewalt d'avoir permis à cet homme de réfuter les accusations mensongères de Krakauer....Sans Boukreev, combien de morts y aurait-il eus? Toutes les décisions prises par lui ce jour là sont bien éclairées, et logiques et avérées dans les faits!
4 people found this helpful
Report
ブロードピーク
5.0 out of 5 stars どうしても手に入れたく購入
Reviewed in Japan on November 11, 2019
和訳本はある図書館の保存倉庫に辛くも残っていた。手許に置きたいが中古本はプレミアム付いて高額かつ入手難。それならこの際英語の原書にチャレンジしてみるかと購入。
時はかなり過ぎ去ったが、エベレストでのこの大量遭難の実話、とりわけブクレーエフの立場からの話に興味を惹かれている。自分にとっては宝になりうる本。
Jared
5.0 out of 5 stars A great read, a tragic end.
Reviewed in Australia on August 4, 2018
I've been waiting twenty odd years to read this book - took that long to get to Kindle. Fascinating to finally hear first hand (with assistance from DeWalt) from Anatoli about the ill fated 96 Everest climb. The unedited text from the conversations between the authors gives great insight into boukreevs experience on Everest. He comes across as an honest man, with integrity, and thoroughly dedicated to climbing. Such a shame a shadow remains after the character assassination that Jon Krakauer inflicted on him. The argument between krakauer and DeWalt - that's well documented in the book - is unedifying, remains unresolved (as it will forever!?) and seems ultimately to reflect the egos of krakauer and DeWalt with boukreev the bemused and exasperated bystander.
2 people found this helpful
Report